This is the second of two Advent reflections. The first was focused on John the Baptist. This one is focused on Mary, the Christ-bearer.
It has been my experience that when people start talking about “tradition” in church they are rarely
referring to anything that goes back more than fifty years, let alone to that great
river of tradition rooted in the holy catholic and apostolic faith. What we really mean when we speak of tradition
is “the way we did things in my church
when I was growing up.” Far too often that
is way more about nostalgia than tradition!
William Faulkner once wrote that the past "...is never really dead; it's not even past."
So here's the challenge: if we turn the “tradition” into a yearning for the Eisenhower administration and the Church of our baby-boomer childhoods, then it can be a real challenge for us to hear the words of Holy Scripture through fresh ears. That is especially true as approach Christmas, because the ghosts of Christmas past loom large in our lives! If we think we already know what all of this means, then it is a challenge for the good news to break through.
So here's the challenge: if we turn the “tradition” into a yearning for the Eisenhower administration and the Church of our baby-boomer childhoods, then it can be a real challenge for us to hear the words of Holy Scripture through fresh ears. That is especially true as approach Christmas, because the ghosts of Christmas past loom large in our lives! If we think we already know what all of this means, then it is a challenge for the good news to break through.
If you were raised in the Roman Catholic "tradition" then you can perhaps close your eyes and
see a statue of the Blessed Virgin Mary at the front of the parish church where we grew up. If your family was really religious
then maybe Mary was on the half-shell in your front lawn. On the other hand, if
you grew up Protestant, then you may never have spoken a word about Mary; not ever!
She was just way too Roman Catholic! Of course these biases many of us have carried
into adulthood take us back only about as deep into the tradition as those pre-Vatican II congregations that shaped and concretized many of our biases and
prejudices. That past is not dead; it
isn’t really even past.
For a while, Hathy and I were really into a television show
called “Madmen,” set in the very early 1960s. Whether or not
you’ve seen the show (or remember living through those days) perhaps you’ve had
the experience of watching “Leave It To Beaver” and thought (as I sometimes
have) “Really: those were the good
old days?” For whom exactly? Ward Cleaver? Gender roles were pretty rigid, to
say the least, and from this vantage point that can lead both women and men to a whole range of reactions. In the greater scheme of things, it really wasn’t that long ago. It turns
out the “good old days” had some really bad shadow sides, especially if you
happened to be female, or black, or gay.
So what about Mary? In that American cultural context, Mary became
the “ideal woman” – or at least the ideal woman in a male-dominated Church. In that context, Mary was perceived as very quiet and very
passive and very obedient and very submissive.
Let it be with me…whatever you say boss. I don’t mean to trivialize this. I mean to
challenge myself and anyone reading this: because at some level this part of the "tradition" isn't really past.
Even so, there’s something about Mary. There is something in Mary’s willingness to say "yes" to God and something about her song, the Magnificat, that invites a closer look, something that challenges us to dive deeper into the tradition.
It turns out that Mary isn’t a Roman Catholic girl (of course!) but a first-century Jew. Her
parents and friends and husband would never have dreamed of calling her “Holy
Mary, Mother of God.” Just Miriam. This glimpse of her in Luke’s Gospel is of
someone maybe fifteen years old—a sophomore at Nazareth High. Her Song—the Magnificat—is
about what is possible for all human beings, female and male, young and old, with
God’s help. Her soul magnifies the Lord.
Think about what that means. I think it means something like, with God we can
do infinitely more than we can ask or imagine. I think it means that when we do
a little thing in the name of Christ, it ripples out to change the world,
magnified by the grace of God! It turns out that there is a way older tradition
that Miriam draws on for strength as she sings this new song to the Lord, which
is really a riff on an old song first recorded by Hannah. (That song can be found in I Samuel 2:1-10, sung at the birth of her son, Samuel.)
Mary pre-figures Pentecost: the day when the Holy Spirit breaks
down all walls that divide us into "us" and “them.” In truth there is only us, beloved children of God. Mary models for us what it might mean to let
the Holy Spirit blow through our lives and make us new in spite of the dominant
culture’s expectations. She knew, as Hannah knew, that God cares
about justice and cares especially for the poor. She knew that the deck is
stacked and that in this world kids attending inner-city schools or growing up
in the third world do not have the same opportunities that as kids living in the suburbs.
This is why I shared the icon (above) of Our Lady Mother of Ferguson. God loves us all, but God wants the playing field to be more even, and so somebody has to take the side of the underdog. That is what the liberation theologians mean when they speak of God’s preferential option for the poor and I think Mary is doing liberation theology in the Magnificat. Like the other great figure of Advent, she is about the work of making a more level highway through the wilderness. I wonder how the woman who sings this song would feel about a tax plan that rewards those who have more than enough and further penalizes those who are at the economic bottom?
This is why I shared the icon (above) of Our Lady Mother of Ferguson. God loves us all, but God wants the playing field to be more even, and so somebody has to take the side of the underdog. That is what the liberation theologians mean when they speak of God’s preferential option for the poor and I think Mary is doing liberation theology in the Magnificat. Like the other great figure of Advent, she is about the work of making a more level highway through the wilderness. I wonder how the woman who sings this song would feel about a tax plan that rewards those who have more than enough and further penalizes those who are at the economic bottom?
When she riffs on Hannah’s Song, she stands in a long line
of Biblical prophets, female and male, who know that God has no problem knocking the proud and
arrogant and powerful down a few pegs, a God who rejoices in bringing up the lowly to fill the
hungry with good things. This is not because God plays class warfare; it's because we do, every day. It's not because God hates
the rich. It's because we keep building systems that make the rich richer and the poor poorer. And God really does love the poor, the ones who in the Bible
are called God’s anawim—God’s little
ones. In this dog-eat-dog world the
anawim need God on their side because the rich do quite well taking care
of themselves.
Mary will teach her child, Jesus, to love the poor as God loves them; and as she loves them. She will teach him how to read the prophets, so that when his public ministry begins his first words will sound a lot like the song we heard his mother singing today. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
Mary will teach her child, Jesus, to love the poor as God loves them; and as she loves them. She will teach him how to read the prophets, so that when his public ministry begins his first words will sound a lot like the song we heard his mother singing today. The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.
Mary is called by God through the very same pattern
that we find throughout the Old Testament whenever God needs to have a job
done: from Abraham to Moses to Samuel to Isaiah with his “unclean lips.” The
angel says, “I’ve got a job for you.” Like those who have gone before her, she is
initially fearful and confused. “How can all this be?” she asks. The angel
insists that it can be because with God all things are possible. That’s when Mary
sings: I am fully open to the will of God
for my life. That is not "submissive" but empowering, for everyone who responds to God's call, female or male. Mary has a choice. I love the lines in Denise
Levertov’s poem, The Annunciation,
which go like this:
…we are told of meek obedience. No
one mentions
courage
The engendering Spirit
did not enter her without consent. God waited.
She was free
to accept or refuse, choice
courage
The engendering Spirit
did not enter her without consent. God waited.
She was free
to accept or refuse, choice
integral to humanness.
Mary is free to say, “get lost angel!” Instead, she chooses freely, to say: Here I am! Send me! In so doing, she is the first and model
disciple. She is bold and courageous and strong in this moment, and not this
one only. She will have to be bold and courageous and strong to raise a son
like the one she raises. And she will have be bold and courageous and strong
when her son walks the Via Delarosa some thirty years later, as
her heart is pierced and her son dies on a tree. Mary has to bury her child,
something no parent should ever have to do.
There is nothing passive or submissive about
Mary. And while she may not have a starring role in the Bible—her role is
crucial in the deeper, wider, tradition. Roman Catholics may well say too much
about her, but Protestants have not yet said nearly enough. Mary says “yes” to
God and the world is changed. She is Christ-bearer, which is precisely the
ministry that you and I are called to: to make room in ourselves for Christ to
be born; to take on our flesh.
No comments:
Post a Comment